I’ve been running it for a while now and I am still under 40,000K with out of the box filter lists (Chromium/Linux). Both are identified as malware (Bitcoin mining) upon scanning with MalwareBytes but MalwareBytes can't detect the malware that keeps on creating. This folder contains 'dlIhost.exe' and 'WinRing0圆4.sys'. So typically, after the initial setup, users won’t change their filter lists, and I expect Â♛lock in such case to display a much lower memory footprint than what I see in your screenshot. After every reboot, a hidden folder gets created named 'Dll' in C:\\Users\\user\\AppData\\Roaming. Yuki2718 added the A: In progress label on Nov 30, 2021. So for the benchmarks I ran myself, I made sure that all extensions were restarted after having picked the proper set of filter lists, such that none would be penalized memory-footprint wise by the reload operations (it’s not memory leaks, just chromium which somehow doesn’t return all the freed memory in such case - I don’t know why). Yuki2718 added a commit that referenced this issue on Nov 28, 2021. forcing a reload of the filters without restarting the extension. But another scenario where I’ve seen memory footprint to stay on the high side is when we change the selection of filter lists in the dashboard, i.e. AdGuard is the fastest and most lightweight ad blocking extension that effectively blocks all types of ads on all web pages Choose AdGuard for the browser. Sometimes the browser is somewhat capricious and will take longer to make good garbage collection. The most popular ad blocker for Chrome and Safari, now available for Firefox Block all advertisements on all web pages, even Facebook, Youtube, and Hulu. I find in your screenshot Â♛lock to be on the high side memory-wise. AdBlock for Firefox Firefox (ko) Firefox AdBlock for Firefox.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |